Cases 21 - 30 of 41
ESPINAL v. NEW PRIME INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04868
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO J ESPINAL
Defendant:
CRAIG A TREON , NEW PRIME, INC. , PRIME, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONTINI et al v. NEW PRIME, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01591
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. MONTINI and CORRINE MONTINI
Defendant:
NEW PRIME, INC. and KAMAL ADOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New Prime, Inc., v. Act Truck & Trailer, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01052
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc.,
Defendant:
Act Truck & Trailer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AKIN-OLOTU v. KEITH et al
as 2:2015cv01644
Plaintiff:
KEHINDE J. AKIN-OLOTU
Defendant:
ANDREW KEITH and NEW PRIME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
New Prime, Inc. v. Brandon Balchune Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02410
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc.
Defendant:
Brandon Balchune Construction, Inc. and Pocono Transcrete, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Pocono Transcrete, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Brandon Balchune Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILES et al v. SYKES et al
as 1:2014cv05595
Plaintiff:
MELVIN MILES and KAREN MILES
Defendant:
HOWARD SYKES, III , NEW PRIME, INC. , PRIME, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KARSOS v. WALKER et al
as 3:2013cv05766
Plaintiff:
JOHN KARSOS
Defendant:
TERRY RAY WALKER, NEW PRIME INC. and JOHN DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PAPAIOANNOU v. WALKER et al
as 2:2013cv05711
Plaintiff:
DIMITRA PAPAIOANNOU
Defendant:
TERRY RAY WALKER, JOHN KARSOS, NEW PRIME INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuna et al v. Taylor et al
as 3:2013cv02435
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kuna and Mary Lee Kuna
Defendant:
Joseph Taylor and New Prime, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
