Cases 1 - 10 of 11
216 East 29th Street Trust v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
216 East 29th Street Trust
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK and New York City Commission on Human Rights
Intervenor:
Safe Horizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacNeal v. New York City Commission on Human Rights et al
as 1:2023cv05890
Plaintiff:
Kelly MacNeal
Defendant:
New York City Commission on Human Rights, Sapna Raj and Jacqueline Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gill v. Mercy College
as 18-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patricia Gill
Defendant - Appellee:
Mercy College, Evan Imber-Black, Michael Sperling and others
Defendant:
New York City Commission on Human Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Best-Simpson v. Gosseen et al
as 1:2011cv06001
Defendant:
430 Clinton Avenue & Associates, Dr. Calvin Adderley, Lanny Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Best-Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rosu v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05437
Plaintiff:
Mircea Rosu
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Commission on Human Rights, Patricia L. Gatling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
