Cases 1 - 10 of 526
GRANGER v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
MOLLY GRANGER
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and TRANSIT WORKERS UNION L. 100 TWU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MIRZA et al v. New York City Transit Authority et al
as 1:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Martin MIRZA and Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Defendant:
New York City Transit Authority and TRANSIT WORKERS UNION L 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bledsoe v. New York City Transit Authority
as 24-1015
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BLEDSOE
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY and AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 726
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) v. Rudomin et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)
Defendant:
Gerri L. Rudomin, Izak Rudomin, Mortgage Electronic Recording Systems, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morrison v. Reeves
as 24-556
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. MORRISON
Defendant:
SONIA REEVES and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith et al v. The New York City Transit Authority
as 1:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
David Smith and Tatyana Klimenko
Defendant:
The New York City Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Joseph v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
as 24-383
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON JOSEPH
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY, New York City Transit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
