Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Alec Byrne v. Getty Images US, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Alec Byrne
Defendant:
GETTY IMAGES (US), INC., Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, Dotdash Media Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Osho International Foundation v. Chapman Way et al
as 2:2019cv09602
Defendant:
Submarine Entertainment, LLC, Insider, Inc., Netflix, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Osho International Foundation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00939
Plaintiff:
Waymo LLC
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Ottomotto LLC, Otto Trucking LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Colin Sebern, Ognen Stojanovski, Tyto LiDAR, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Edward Russo, Nicholas Gicinto, Richard Jacobs and others
Intervenor:
Bloomberg L.P., The Hearst Corporation, BuzzFeed, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Travis Kalanick and Slack, Inc.
Respondent:
Stroz Friedberg, LLC
Special Master:
John Lee Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cox et al v. Godaddy et al
as 2:2013cv00962
Plaintiff:
Crystal L Cox
Defendant:
Bob Parsons Godaddy, Godaddy Incorporated, Peter L Michaelson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Randazza et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2012cv02040
Counter Defendant:
David S. Aman, David S. Aman, Apple and others
Defendant:
Eliot Bernstein and Crystal L Cox
Cross Defendant:
Bernie Cassidy and Jessica Griffin Godaddy
Counter Claimant:
Crystal L Cox and Crystal L Cox
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Randazza, Marc J Randazza and Natalia Randazza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nicholas Spark v. The New York Times Company et al
as 2:2007cv08162
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Spark
Defendant:
The New York Times Company and Lou Reda Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
