Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
COPELAND v. NEWFIELD BANK et al
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
MARCIA COPELAND, M.D.
Defendant:
NEWFIELD BANK, LINDA GAZZARA and GAZZARA REALTY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0052
DIPIETRO v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv01441
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CHRISTIE, GLENN GRANT, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONTARINO v. M.D. SASS ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01957
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND V. CONTARINO, JR. and FOXMOOR AT NEWFIELD LLC
Defendant:
M.D. SASS INVESTORS SERVICES, INC. , U.S. BANK, N.A., ROBERT STEIN and others
Movant:
MSC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
CONTARINO v. M.D. SASS ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 3:2012cv01957
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND V. CONTARINO, JR. and FOXMOOR AT NEWFIELD LLC
Defendant:
M.D. SASS INVESTORS SERVICES, INC. , U.S. BANK, N.A. , ROBERT STEIN and others
Movant:
MSC, LLC and Jeanne Van Duzer Lang Boyer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
VAN DUZER LANG BOYER v. STEIN et al
as 3:2012cv01893
Plaintiff:
JEANNE VAN DUZER LANG BOYER
Defendant:
ROBERT W. STEIN, CRUSADER SERVICING CORP. , ROYAL TAX LIEN SERVICES, LLC and others
Consol_plaintiff:
MSC, LLC , RONALD ENGLISH , RAYMOND V. CONTARINO, JR. and others
Consol_defendant:
CHUN LI, ROBERT E. ROTHMAN, STEPHEN E HRUBY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MURAKUSH CALIPHATES OF AMEXEM v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
MURAKUSH CALIPHATE OF AMEXEM INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SEVERAL UNKNOWN NJ STATE POLICE OFFICERS, BURLINGTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARRAKUSH SOCIETY v. TOWNSHIP OF NEWFIELD et al
as 1:2009cv03591
Plaintiff:
MARRAKUSH SOCIETY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF NEWFIELD, NEWFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
