Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Nguyen v. Florida
as 6:2023cv01560
Plaintiff:
Hasa Nguyen
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NGUYEN v. GRAHAM et al
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
AN NGUYEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, VALDOSTA DISCIPLINARY PROSECUTOR, TANGIE MORRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00179
Petitioner:
Tommy Nguyen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv60801
Plaintiff:
Vinh Sanh Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Nguyen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 6:2021cv00634
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Phuc Minh Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nguyen v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv21304
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Phuc Minh Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeanty et al v. Elkins et al
as 2:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ewing, Jason Jerome Springer, Jerome L. Pitts and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Linda Geter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick v. Nguyen et al
as 8:2020cv00894
Defendant:
James Ventre and Jacky Nguyen
Plaintiff:
Shawn Roderick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv00358
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Nho Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
