Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Nguyen v. Ho
as 1:2024cv10588
Plaintiff:
Kim Nguyen
Defendant:
Anthony Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nguyen v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 95-cr-10266-DPW
as 1:2023cv13152
Petitioner:
Minh Hung Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Emmerman v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2023cv11027
Plaintiff:
Thomas Emmerman
Defendant:
Victoria Nguyen and Anthony Paino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. et al v. Glove King LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10530
Plaintiff:
Bulk MRO Industrial Supply, Inc. and Bulk MRO PPE Supply LLC
Defendant:
Glove King LLC, Atlantic Capital Lending Limited, Henry Leong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Nguyen
as 1:2021cv11667
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Dennis Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Nguyen v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 07-cr-10050-PBS
as 1:2020cv11193
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Diep Van Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
