Cases 1 - 10 of 366
United States of America v. Hunter (Samia)
as 24-1553
Defendant:
ADAM SAMIA, JOSEPH MANUEL HUNTER, MICHAEL FILTER and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Baskin v. Fort Scott Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Nico Baskin
Defendant:
Fort Scott Police Department and Bourbon County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Katz et al
as 1:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Hill
Defendant:
Melinda Katz, Jacob Saks, Police Officer Crociata Stefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADT LLC et al v. Skyline Security Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20758
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Defendant:
Skyline Security Management, Inc., Edwin Arroyave, Matthew Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bisschop v. University of Miami Hospital & Clinics
as 1:2024mc21526
Plaintiff:
Nico Bisschop
Defendant:
University of Miami Hospital & Clinics
Bisschop v. University of Miami Hospital & Clinics
as 1:2024cv21526
Plaintiff:
Nico Bisschop
Defendant:
University of Miami Hospital and Clinics
Bisschop v. University of Miami Hospital and Clinics
as 1:2024cv21520
Plaintiff:
Nico Bisschop
Defendant:
University of Miami Hospital and Clinics
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND v. NICO CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC.
as 1:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
NICO CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
