Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00961
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 3:2021cv01174
Plaintiff:
Brad Miller, Mark Mackenzie and Patrick Nielson
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2016cv00447
Defendant:
East Ridge Animal Hospital, Stacy Kendall, Gale A. McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Nielson et al
as 1:2015cv01832
Defendant:
East Ridge Animal Hospital, Dave Groff, Stacy Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stacy v. McCool et al
as 6:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Stacy
Defendant:
Andy McCool, Oregon's Governor, Oregon's Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kinzell v. Nielson
as 2:2007cv01316
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kinzell
Defendant:
Cody James Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Newman v. Oregon et al
as 3:2000cv00941
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nielson, Quincy Newman, Daryl Micka and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Oregon Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
