Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Nieves-Garcia v. Garland
as 24-3120
Petitioner:
JOSE ALFREDO NIEVES-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024mc00136
Respondent:
Social Security Administration
Petitioner:
Juan Nieves
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
United States of America v. Velez (Garcia)
as 24-923
Defendant:
JONATHAN GARCIA, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kiani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 8:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Shehroz Kiani
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Nieves Cardinale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
United States of America v. Reid (Soto)
as 24-647
Defendant:
CASWELL SENIOR, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Huanga Nieves v. Garland
as 24-482
Petitioner:
MICHAEL VINICIO CAIZA HUANGA and FERNANDA MARIBEL HUANGA NIEVES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Adames
as 24-133
Defendant:
ROLANDO NIEVES, ANICASIO HERNANDEZ, FRANK VELEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JHOAN ADAMES and Chelo
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lopez-Marti et al v. Geico Insurance Company et al
as 8:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
Suljeily Lopez-Marti and Sylvia Nieves-Pepin
Defendant:
Geico Insurance Company, Jonathan Elias-Rodriguez, John Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
