Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PATEL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ADAIR FORD BOROUGHS, KAMALA D. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSTON v. SINGH et al
as 1:2022cv01284
Not Classified By Court:
NIKKI L. JOHNSTON and WHALA B. SINGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
AGEDAH v. WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
THEOPHILUS TARI AGEDAH
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METRO AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, NIKKI MACKALL and DESIREE ROCHELLE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv03046
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT NIKKI LAVENHOUSE, DETECTIVE SGT LARRY MURCHISON, OFFICER KIDANE ROBYEL and others
Plaintiff:
T.B., minor, by his mother, guardian, and next friend Sophia, SOPHIA ALFORD and T.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LIOUNIS v. KREBS et al
as 1:2017cv01621
Plaintiff:
PETER LIOUNIS
Defendant:
KEVIN KREBS, CHRISTINA D. TROIANA, NIKKI GRAMIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MAJID v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2016cv00731
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MAJID
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILSEY v. PRODAN et al
as 1:2012cv00880
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DONALD WILSEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL PRODAN, NIKKI GALEY, W. ALLEN MYRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
