Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Zapata v. Florida Division of Elections et al
as 1:2022cv22424
Plaintiff:
Randy Zapata
Defendant:
Florida Division of Elections, Ron DeSantiss, Charlie Crist and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okwor v. State of Florida
as 0:2022cv60979
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Okwor
Defendant:
State of Florida, Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Danny Ho v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 22-11430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY K. HO
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, RICK SWEARINGEN, FDLE Commissioner and others
CLERVRAIN et al v. SCOTT et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, WESLINE CASIR, BERTONIA EDWARD and others
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, MARCO RUBIO, NIKKI FRIED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ho v. Moody et al
as 5:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Danny Ho
Defendant:
Ashley B. Moody, Ron Desantis, Rick Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Desantis et al
as 8:2020cv00695
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Brian Skoniki, Ron Desantis and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Himes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Poppell et al
as 8:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Chad Poppell, Eric Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Himes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Himes v. Desantis et al
as 8:2020cv00550
Defendant:
Ron Desantis, Nikki Fried, Jimmy Patronis and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Himes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2019cv00319
Defendant:
JULIA MCCALL, ASHLEY MOODY, MELINDA COONROD and others
Plaintiff:
GARY RAY BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
