Cases 1 - 10 of 14
villafranca v. Shubladze
as 5:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
jose villafranca
Defendant:
Nikoloz Shubladze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02611
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04733
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Shulaya
as 18-3852
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Zurab Dzhanashvili, AKA Zura, Akaki Ubilava, AKA Ako, Hamlet Uglava and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Razhden Shulaya, AKA Brother, AKA Roma
Jikia v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv05754
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Nikoloz Jikia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Shulaya (Vinokurov)
as 18-1390
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Razhden Shulaya, AKA Brother, AKA Roma, Zurab Dzhanashvili, AKA Zura, Akaki Ubilava, AKA Ako and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Artur Vinokurov, AKA Rizhy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05757
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
