Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Mark Andrews v. California Department of Consumer Affairs, et al
as 22-16612
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK TERRENCE ANDREWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, SONOMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Theodis Brown, Sr., et al v. RICO Defendants, et al
as 22-3158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Theodis Brown, Sr. and Gail Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
RICO Defendants, Named and Unnamed and Travelers Insurance Company, Ftim & Motorist
Mark Andrews v. California Department of Consu, et al
as 18-15594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK TERRENCE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, SONOMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and others
Tyrosh Brown v. Rau's Party Store, et al
as 13-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYROSH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
RAU'S PARTY STORE and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, named as George the owner
Glassey v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
James P. Glassey
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Glassey v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv02564
Plaintiff:
James P. Glassey
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Alvarez v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv02273
Plaintiff:
John R. Alvarez
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv01097
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Douglas
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoen v. United States
as 1:2012cv00940
Plaintiff:
Amber Schoen
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and DANIEL KEN "DAN&q INOUYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PENTAGON, U.S. SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
