Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits v. Noce Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2019cv03451
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits
Defendant:
Noce Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Noce
as 2:2015cv01382
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
Marco Noce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Amroc Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
Amroc Construction, Inc. and Marco Noce
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Noce Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
Noce Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Orrand et al v. LIbby Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Raymond Orrand and Trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Plan, Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Education & Safety Fund
Defendant:
Libby Construction Company, Inc., Liberatore Noce, Amroc Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Noce v. Tractor Supply Company et al
as 1:2009cv01059
Plaintiff:
Sarah R. Noce
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company and Brian D Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hirz et al v. Travelcomm Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01833
Plaintiff:
Donald Hirz, Mary Lou Ambrose, Jennifer Baxter and others
Defendant:
Travelcomm Industries, Inc., RIGOBERTO Sotolongo and PETER Sotolongo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
