Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Nolan v. S.C.I. Coal Township et al
as 1:2009cv01823
Petitioner:
Daniel Nolan
Respondent:
S.C.I. Coal Township and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Of America v. Nolan
as 1:2009mc00191
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Gary Nolan
PARKER v. PENNSTAR BANK, NBT et al
as 3:2009cv00490
Plaintiff:
Florence R. Parker
Defendant:
Pennstar Bank, NBT, CITIMORTGAGE, Inc., David M. Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pruden v. Medical Directors et al
as 3:2008cv00562
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Medical Directors, Nolan, Cresson Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RBS Citizens, N.A. v. Schoenhaar et al
as 3:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Defendant:
Erwin Schoenhaar and Jennifer M. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Pruden v. Schuillkill County Doctor et al
as 3:2007cv01847
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruden
Defendant:
Schuillkill County Doctor, Camp Hill SOU & Doctors, Cresson Ms. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States Of America et al v. Nolan
as 1:2007mc00181
Plaintiff:
United States Of America, Dennis P Zmudzin and Internal Revenue Service
Defendant:
Michael D. Nolan
Nolan v. Wynder et al
as 4:2007cv00926
Petitioner:
William J. Nolan
Respondent:
James Wynder, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, District Attorney of Luzerne County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CCO Mortgage Corp. v. Schoenhaar et al
as 3:2007cv00822
Plaintiff:
CCO Mortgage Corp.
Defendant:
Erwin Schoenhaar and Jennifer M. Nolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
