Cases 61 - 70 of 75
NOLAN v. HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA) et al
as 1:2016cv01265
Defendant:
HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA) and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FANNIE MAE)
Plaintiff:
VICKI R. NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUARTE v. NOLAN
as 1:2015cv01396
Plaintiff:
PAMELA DUARTE
Defendant:
MICHAEL EDWARD NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
GRENADIER v. BOASBERG et al
as 1:2014cv01463
Plaintiff:
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Defendant:
JAMES E. BOASBERG, BERYL A. HOWELL, REGGIE B. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Carolyn Nolan
as 14-3025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Carolyn Denise Nolan
MCKENZIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
NOLAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KANSAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CORTEZ v. ALSABAH et al
as 1:2012cv01874
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant:
LULUA ALSABAH, MARYPAT WRIGHT, TERRANCE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alonzo Scurlock v. Charles E. Samuels Jr., et al
as 12-5245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alonzo Edward Scurlock
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley G. Lappin, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. L. Norwood, Regional Director- Federal Bureau of Prisons, Terry O'Brien, Warden, Lee County Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
COCHRAN et al v. IBM et al
as 1:2011cv02069
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. COCHRAN, JR., ITMS and TPS
Defendant:
IBM, ADECCO, VIRGINIA ROMMETTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2011cv00554
Petitioner:
NOLAN JAMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SCURLOCK v. LAPPINS et al
as 1:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ALONZO EDWARD SCURLOCK
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPINS, J. L. NORWOOD, TERRY O'BRIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
