Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Vincent et al v. D R Horton Inc Gulf Coast et al
as 6:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
Kim Meche, Kane Moore, Lori Landry and others
Defendant:
Mark Ste. Marie, Bayou Tortue Manor Architectural Control Committee, Clifton D. Guidry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. McCain et al
as 5:2018cv00293
Plaintiff:
Nolan C Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Troy Poret, Rodney Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McCain et al
as 1:2017cv01206
Plaintiff:
Nolan C Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Rodney Slay, Troy Poret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Campbell et al
as 3:2017cv00707
Plaintiff:
Cary Ellis Malone
Defendant:
Jonathan D Campbell, Holly Chambers Jones, George Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McCain et al
as 1:2017cv00489
Plaintiff:
Nolan C Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Rodney Slay, Troy Poret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David R Jackson v. Keith Blackman et al
as 3:2017cv00286
Plaintiff:
David R Jackson
Defendant:
Keith Blackman, Ken Slocum, Harrison Cade Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McCain et al
as 1:2016cv01021
Plaintiff:
Nolan C Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Rodney Slay, Troy Poret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv01782
Plaintiff:
Daniel-Ralph Bishop
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Jeffrey Grondolsky, J L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2015cv00996
Plaintiff:
Brian Nolan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
John Howard Scott
Defendant:
John Smith, Nolan Bass, Edward Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
