Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NOLASCO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv04119
Plaintiff:
RAMONA J. CHERY NOLASCO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01231
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OSORIO-MARTINEZ et al v. JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III et al
as 5:2017cv01747
Plaintiff:
WENDY AMPARO OSORIO-MARTINEZ , CARMEN ALEYDA LOBO MEJIA , MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ NOLASCO and others
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III , JOHN F. KELLY , THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Movant:
CENTER FOR GENDER AND REFUGEE STUDIES
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
J.E.L.M. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00704
Petitioner:
J.E.L.M. and MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ NOLASCO
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv06551
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
LEDESMA-NOLASCO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv00882
Plaintiff:
JUAN LEDESMA-NOLASCO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NOLASCO v. LANDMARK AMERICANA TAP & GRILL
as 2:2014cv05642
Plaintiff:
JUAN NOLASCO
Defendant:
LANDMARK AMERICANA TAP & GRILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ENDEREZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49183
Plaintiff:
NOLASCO D. ENDEREZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
