Cases 61 - 70 of 154
OSBORNE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv02258
Plaintiff:
GLENN OSBORNE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CAMPBELL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
TYRONE M. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
STARNER v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv07613
Plaintiff:
RANDY STARNER
Defendant:
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
FULLER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv01646
Plaintiff:
DEBRA FULLER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SOLIMAN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv05256
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SOLIMAN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HOMER et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv01055
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOMER and HARRY J. RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DYNKA v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv00933
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DYNKA
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
CHEMTURA CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SLASKI v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02925
Plaintiff:
FELIX SLASKI
Defendant:
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SHAWDA v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 4:2010cv01175
Plaintiff:
Roger Shawda
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
STOKES v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv02217
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C. STOKES
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
