Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Shelby Advocates, et al v. Tre Hargett, et al
as 19-6142
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDY BLACKBURN, DONNA BARRETT, GREGORY DUCKETT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITNEY THORNTON, MICHAEL KERNELL, JOE TOWNS, JR. and others
Amicus Curiae:
13 ELECTION OFFICIALS, U.S. TECHNOLOGY POLICY COMMITTEE OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY and NATIONAL ELECTION DEFENSE COALITION AND OTHER INDIVIDUAL ELECTION SECURITY EXPERTS
Shelby Advocates for Valid Elections et al v. Hargett et al
as 2:2018cv02706
Defendant:
Anthony Tate, Shelby County Election Commission, Mike McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby Advocates for Valid Elections, Michael Kernell, Joe Towns, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Shelby County Election Commission
as 2:2018cv02534
Defendant:
Anthony Tate, Dee Nollner, Robert Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Noel Hutchison, Tamara Hendrix, Janice F. Scott and others
Undetermined:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Amber Jones, et al v. Kent Coleman, et al
as 17-5846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMBER JONES and DEANNA LACK
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT COLEMAN, HENRY FINCHER, PATRICIA HEIM and others
Amber Jones, et al v. Kent Coleman, et al
as 16-5908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMBER JONES and DEANNA LACK
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY FINCHER, PATRICIA HEIM, TOM LAWLESS and others
Jones et al v. Coleman et al
as 3:2016cv00677
Plaintiff:
Amber Jones and Deanna Lack
Defendant:
Kent Coleman , Henry Fincher , Patricia Heim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strong et al v. The Tennessee Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance Registry of Election Finance et al
as 3:2015cv00739
Plaintiff:
Williamson Strong , Sarah Barnard , Jim Cheney and others
Defendant:
The Tennessee Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance Registry of Election Finance , Tom Lawless , Patricia Heim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
