Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lux et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Herbert W. Lux, Jr. and Janice M. Lux
Defendant:
Roger L Harris, S A Norris, B. Seay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanley v. Lambert et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Andrew Kolp, Brice Lambert and Marie Bristow
Plaintiff:
Norris Edward Stanley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelligar v. Eaton et al
as 1:2018cv00508
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wade Nelligar
Defendant:
Corporal Eaton, Clerk of United States District Court, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Soden et al
as 3:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
Norris Edward Stanley, Sr.
Defendant:
Soden, Andrew Kolp, Marie Bristow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tweed v. Rappahannock Regional Jail et al
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Tweed
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, Joseph Higgs, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Crisco v. Stolle et al
as 2:2016cv00530
Plaintiff:
Corey Crisco
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle, Ms. Norris and K.M. Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geba v. Norris et al
as 2:2014cv00612
Plaintiff:
Kerstin R. Geba
Defendant:
Kimberly E. Norris and Lois C. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. The City of Newport News, Virginia et al
as 4:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Corey Moody
Defendant:
The City of Newport News, Virginia , James D. Fox , Richard W. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority et al
as 1:2009cv01052
Plaintiff:
Loretta Mitchell and Loretta Mitchell
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, Scott Baird, Cpl. Barbozza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
