Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Michael Tatro v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc., et al
as 19-56002
Defendant:
CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A., a National Banking Association, TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a California company, VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., a New York corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a New York corporation and FDS BANK, FSB, a Federal Savings Bank
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. TATRO
Tatro v. Sterling Jewelers Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01305
Defendant:
Sterling Jewelers Inc., T-Mobile, USA, Inc., Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Tatro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Northland Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00994
Plaintiff:
Ramon Perez
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv02419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alarcon v. Northland Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02182
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alarcon
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc. and Galaxy Asset Purchasing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Foster et al v. Northland Group Inc.
as 2:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Michael Foster and Juryleen Foster
Defendant:
Northland Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
