Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Muflihi v. Rikers Island Employees et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Salman Muflihi
Defendant:
Rikers Island Employees, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fore v. McDonough
as 2:2023cv03610
Plaintiff:
Chaplain Harry Fore
Defendant:
Denis R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robbins v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
James Robbins
Defendant:
Warden Charisma Carter and Imam-Islamic Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, John Doe, "John Doe" Kerpieck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2021cv09902
Plaintiff:
Paul White
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Seven Unknown DOE Agents of DHS/CDF/OASIS/Gloval Tel Link et al, Superintendent Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Moore, Mr. Miclteler, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demeris Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Bryant et al
as 1:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Islamic Chaplain, Palmer, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torim v. United States of America et al
as 7:2019cv09192
Defendant:
Officer Ahamad Rezak, J.L. Maldonado, Ahmed Rezak and others
Plaintiff:
Shloime Torim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Grossman v. United States of America et al
as 7:2019cv09191
Defendant:
Officer Ahamad Rezak, J.L. Maldonado, Ahmed Rezak and others
Plaintiff:
Yitz Grossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
Perez v. Carter et al
as 9:2019cv00824
Plaintiff:
Felipe Perez and Felipe B. Perez
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe, Mr. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
