Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PARADIGM MECHANICAL, LLC v. NUEHEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC F/K/A NUTERRA HELATHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC
as 2:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
PARADIGM MECHANICAL, LLC
Defendant:
NUEHEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC F/K/A NUTERRA HELATHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
PARADIGM MECHANICAL, LLC v. NUEHEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2022cv01413
Defendant:
NUEHEALTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC and NUTERRA HELATHCARE MANAGEMENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
PARADIGM MECHANICAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Adames v. NueHealth Management Svc
as 21-10974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Micaela Adames, Michelle
Defendant / Appellee:
NueHealth Management Services, L.L.C., formerly known as Nueterra Healthcare Management, L.L.C., doing business as NueHealth and MetDalSpi, L.L.C., doing business as Methodist Hospital for Surgery
McCalley v. UT Southwestern Medical Center
as 21-10157
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Smith, Dr, Dr Rooma Vemupali, NueHealth and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damaris Plaisant McCalley
McCalley v. UT Southwestern Medical Center et al
as 3:2020cv03196
Defendant:
Nicole Bunn, Dr Clifton Lyndell Cox, II, The Texas Medical Board and others
Plaintiff:
Damaris Plaisant McCalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
