Cases 1 - 10 of 126
(SS) Greene v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01135
Plaintiff:
Tonya Nunes Greene
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Nunes Dos Santos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2115
Petitioner:
PAULO RICARDO NUNES DOS SANTOS, ISLANNA KYVIA SOUZA DA SILVA and CARLOS RICARDO NUNES DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nune Arakelyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Nune Arakelyan
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Nunes Araujo, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4239
Petitioner:
DIEGO APARECIDO NUNES ARAUJO, JULIA GRACIELIA GOMES CAJADO and VALLENTINA CAJADO NUNES ARAUJO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina et al
as 2:2023at01116
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Concepcion Flores Molina and Lupe C. Nunes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Molina et al
as 1:2023cv01553
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Concepcion Flores Molina and Lupe C. Nunes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shakhramanyan v. United States
as 1:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Nune Shakhramanyan
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Shakhramanvan v. United States
as 1:2023at00568
Plaintiff:
Nune Shakhramanvan
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
