Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Reyes Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-776
Petitioner:
ALAN REYES MURILLO, ANGELES REYES NU EZ, VILMA NUNEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Nunez
as 24-599
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRES NUNEZ
Vargas Garzon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-528
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN A. VARGAS GARZON, KAREN S. TAMAYO NUNEZ and SARA VARGAS TAMAYO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hill v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN T. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manag., official capacity and individual capacity, B. LAYES, Office Technician, official and individual capacity and others
McGee v. State of California, et al.
as 24-393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERSON A. MCGEE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Solorio Nunez v. Garland
as 23-3416
Petitioner:
JORGE SOLORIO NUNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenyatta Mitchell v. Paul Bennett, et al
as 23-55577
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL BENNETT, Supervising Parole Officer, Chula Vista Parole Office, CLAUDIA PLASCENCIA, BONNIE DUMANIS, District Attorney and others
Nunez Vazquez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-899
Petitioner:
JUANA NUNEZ VAZQUEZ, JENIFER PAOLA PENALOZA NUNEZ and JOVANY PENALOZA NUNEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Douglas Pell v. Amy Nunez
as 23-55188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS MERCER PELL
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY NUNEZ, Director of Admissions, State Bar of California
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 23-15164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
