Cases 31 - 40 of 274
Nunez v. Tejas Energy, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jason Kirk Nunez
Defendant:
Tejas Energy, Inc., Sandra Williams and Casey Williams
Bean v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Bean
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Juan J. Nunez, Wayne Douglas Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Nunez
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Juan J Nunez, J.D. Mireles and Rosalinda Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Misael Nunez Marquez
Defendant:
Daniel B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Perry et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
David J Perry and Asst. Warden Juan J Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez and Placido Samaniego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Kuku et al
as 6:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Santiago Mason Gomez
Defendant:
Odunay O Kuku, Assistant Warden LaMorris Marshall, Assistant Warden Juan J Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Company v. Eduardo Sotelo, et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Enrique Nunez Sotelo, Nohemy Sotelo, Eduardo Sotelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Thomas v. Anciso et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Pricsylla Anciso, Juan Nunez, Skinner Sturgis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
