Cases 1 - 10 of 22
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. HEIDER et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR COLEMAN
Defendant:
SERGEANT HEIDER, CAPTAIN SKINNER, CAPTAIN SISSEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJOR v. HALLIGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, PAUL ENNIS, ERICSON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. CLARK, et al
as 1:2019cv00287
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. CLARK, LT. HARMON, AGUSTUS FLOYD and others
Plaintiff:
SHAMEL JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Clark et al
as 1:2019cv01668
Defendant:
Lt. Harmon, Michael E. Clark, Paul Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
Shamel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarity Sports International LLC et al v. Redland Sports et al
as 1:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Redland Sports, Gerry Ochs, MVP Authentics and others
Plaintiff:
Clarity Sports International LLC and Jason Bernstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
OCH et al v. THE PEP BOYS: MANNY, MOE & JACK et al
as 2:2017cv03982
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. OCH and BARBARA A. ZIPPI
Defendant:
THE PEP BOYS: MANNY, MOE & JACK , NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ASSOCIATION and PENN JERSEY AUTO
Thirdparty_defendant:
THE BOEING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
OCHS et al v. READING HOSPITAL
as 5:2014cv04017
Plaintiff:
THOMAS OCHS and LAURA OCHS
Defendant:
READING HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OCHS et al
as 2:2014cv02838
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
STEVEN OCHS, JR. and JESSICA J. OCHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
AMARO v. AMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
VALENTINO AMARO
Defendant:
AMBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM OCHS, KLEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
