Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HALE v. HALE et al
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE HALE
Defendant:
SHERIFF JAMES HALE and OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Hale
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hale and Oconee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLEY v. NOLLEY et al
as 3:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHRIS KELLEY
Defendant:
KEVIN NOLLEY, DAVID STAUFFACHER, SCOTT BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OCONEE COUNTY GEORGIA v. AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv00016
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP, MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OCONEE COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMINE v. ATHENS CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
DAVID AARON ROMINE
Defendant:
ATHENS CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA, ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CLINT DIEBALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PRICE v. OCONEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
LISA PRICE
Defendant:
OCONEE COUNTY GEORGIA and SCOTT RICHARD BERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-13461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Ward v. Kevin Nolley, et al
as 15-13268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHARLES WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN NOLLEY, Investigator, Oconee County Sheriff's Department and JIMMY LECROY, Investigator, Franklin County Sheriff's Department
Athens Cellular Inc. v. Oconee County Georgia, et al
as 15-12067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATHENS CELLULAR INC., d.b.a. Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
OCONEE COUNTY GEORGIA, THE OCONEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, MELVIN DAVIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
