Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PENA v. COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2017cv11523
Plaintiff:
VANESSA G. PENA
Defendant:
COOPER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM, SECURITY OFFICER JOHN DOE I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2017cv04987
Plaintiff:
HAMLET GARCIA, JR.
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, TRUSTEES OF TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2014cv03377
Plaintiff:
SHIM BOYD
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY , ADAM ARDARY , POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv03355
Plaintiff:
JULIO RIVERA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , JOHN DOE, JOSEPH E. O'MALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv02652
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ , JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN DOE and others
Cross_claimant:
CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF CAMDEN
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE, KELLY and OFFICERS JOHN DOE I-III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03275
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , WARRANT UNIT OFFICER BADGE #332, WARRANT UNIT OFFICERS JOHN DOE I-III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03235
Plaintiff:
DAVE MITCHELL , DARREN MICHAEL ALEXANDER , DUVON ALEXIS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS RYAN, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURRAY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv00945
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MURRAY, DELAINE MURRAY, JULIE MURRAY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE, SERGEANT, JOHN DOE, CAPTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
