Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kimberly Potter v. Debra Wehrle, et al
as 24-3097
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY POTTER
Defendant:
DEBRA GORRELL WEHRLE, AUBREY COOK and OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cedeno v. Ohio Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2020cv02659
Defendant:
Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Ohio Attorney General Office and Mary Anne Reese
Plaintiff:
Noel Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracie Hunter v. Ohio Attorney General's Office, et al
as 19-3550
Not Yet Classified:
HAMILTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, TRACIE HUNTER and HONORABLE PATRICK DINKELACKER
Respondent:
OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Tracie Hunter v. Ohio Attorney General's Office, et al
as 19-3515
Respondent / Appellee:
HONORABLE PATRICK DINKELACKER, OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and HAMILTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRACIE HUNTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01522
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00800
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Miller v. Supreme Court of Ohio et al
as 2:2011cv00211
Plaintiff:
Selina Miller
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Ohio, Ohio Attorney General Office, Mary Ellen O'Shaughnessy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
