Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Turner Bey v. Neal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00119
Petitioner: Akeem Turner Bey
Defendant: Mr Neal, Mr Newkirk, Mr Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PENDLETON CORR. FACILITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01207
Defendant: D. ALSIP, C. COOPERIDER, EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff: TERRY DAVIS
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv00273
Director Of Institutional Affairs And Complaint Investigation: AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant: Mr. _________ AMOS, JACK BINION, BEVERLY BLACK and others
Southern Regional Director: RONDLE ANDERSON
Consumer Protection Division: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA
Commissioner I.D.O.C: ED BUSS
Greivance Specialist: JEFF COOPER and Lt. TIMOTHY NICKLES
Captain) (Indiana State Reformatory: Mr. _____ DOWNEY
Superintendent: ALLAN FINNAN and BRETT MIZE
Case Manager: BRUCE HELMING and TOM RICHARDSON
Counselor: MIKE KIDDER and SAMANTHA MADDOX
Chief Of Staff: RANDY KOESTER
Policy Manager: MICHAEL PAVESE
Director Of Internal Affair: WILLARD PLANK and MIKE RAINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv01667
Plaintiff: KENT A. EASLEY
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, SHELBY CO. PROSECUTORS OFFICE, UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KELLER v. INDIANA OMBUDSMAN BUREAU et al
as 1:2008cv00721
Plaintiff: JOHN W. KELLER
Defendant: INDIANA OMBUDSMAN BUREAU, CHARLENE BURKETT, JUSTIN WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NORINGTON v. LIPTOW et al
as 1:2007cv00496
Plaintiff: (LAKESHA) SHAWNTRELL NORINGTON
Defendant: LAWRENCE J. LIPTOW, STANLEY KNIGHT, MR. ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?