Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Beppler v. Capital One, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00446
Defendant:
Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Beppler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
THOMAS v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
SHANNON D. THOMAS
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
POLANCO v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv05826
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCA POLANCO
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goode v. Capital One Financial Corporation
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Alexander Edmund Goode
Defendant:
Capital One N.A. and Capital One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv15306
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CLARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
as 2:2020cv01302
Plaintiff:
CLARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
