Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Honeywell International Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC. and METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Honeywell International, Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 23-2038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED and METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Honeywell International, Inc. v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 23-1850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED and METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
CreeLED, Inc. v. Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule "A"
as 9:2023cv80149
Plaintiff:
CreeLED, Inc.
Defendant:
Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule "A", Coolman Hardware Co., Limited, Dongguan City Wei Gou E-Commerce Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Honeywell International Inc. et al v. OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 3:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc., Hand Held Products, Inc. and Metrologic Instruments, Inc.
Defendant:
OPTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. et al v. OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2019mc00142
Petitioner:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS INC. and HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC.
Respondent:
OPTO ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and HOKKAIDO ELECTRONIC INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
Honeywell International, Inc. et al v. Opticon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01019
Plaintiff:
Metrologic Instruments, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc. and Hand Held Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Opticon Sensors Europe B.V., Opto Electronics Co., Ltd. and Opticon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
