Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas Murphy v. Oregon Circuit Court, et al
as 21-35608
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBERT MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
OREGON CIRCUIT COURT, PRETRIAL/PROBATION OR PAROLE SERVICES, ROBERT CLIVE JONES, U.S. District Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00973
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGee v. State of Oregon Circuit Court et al
as 3:2019cv01173
Respondent:
State of Oregon Circuit Court and MCSO
Petitioner:
Menphrey Douglas McGee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGee v. State of Oregon Circuit Court
as 3:2019cv01154
Plaintiff:
Menphrey Douglas McGee
Defendant:
State of Oregon Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
D.L. Thomas v. Robert Millikan, et al
as 10-35954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D.L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. MILLIKAN, Marion County Oregon, Circuit Court Judge, OREGON STATE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, HERBERT LOVEJOY, Oregon Assistant Attorney General and others
Deshaw v. State of Oregon Circuit Court
as 3:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dale Deshaw
Defendant:
State of Oregon Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thomas v. State of Oregon, et al
as 10-35816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT and others
David Thomas v. United States District Court f
as 10-72409
:
In re: DAVID LEE THOMAS
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
