Cases 1 - 10 of 22
bey v. Campa et al
as 3:2022cv09154
Plaintiff:
hiramu-el-kenyatta bey and Hiramu El Kenyatta Bey
Defendant:
Michelle Campa, Greg, Sky Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
USA v. Torres
as 21-50426
Defendant / Appellant:
Orlando Rodriguez Torres
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Emilio Rodriguez
as 20-20141
Defendant / Appellant:
EMILIO ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Luis Rodriguez Solorzano v. Kirstjen Nielson, et al
as 19-50220
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT COWAN, In His Official Capacity as Director of the National Benefits Center, MARGARET A. HARTNETT, In Her Official Capacity as Director of the El Paso Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LUIS ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ SOLORZANO
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez (Pena)
as 18-1042
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, AKA Shorty, Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Jesus Sanchez, Sealed Defedant 3 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ariel Pena, AKA Bin, AKA Vin
USA v. Emilio Rodriguez
as 17-40635
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMILIO ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Perez
as 17-725
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Jesus Sanchez, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Miguel Cerda, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Manganzon and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Manuel Geovanny Rodriguez-Perez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Manny, AKA Shorty
USA v. Omar Rodriguez
as 17-40041
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMAR ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
USA v. Omar Rodriguez
as 16-41544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OMAR ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
