Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Martinez v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Oscar Martinez
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Vowal v. Martinez Jr et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Williman Mescall, Willeman Forgey, Oscar Martinez Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Vowal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dart et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph A. Shaw
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Erin Stokes, Jacob Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hendry et al v. Lake County, Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Craig Hendry and Tyler Pierce
Defendant:
Lake County, Indiana, Lake County Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Joseph Kraus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. SuperJeweler.com Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11021
Plaintiff:
Oscar Martinez
Defendant:
SuperJeweler.com Inc., Andrew Fox and SuperJeweler.com Inc. doing business as Super Jeweler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez Avalos, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4060
Petitioner:
OSCAR MARTINEZ AVALOS, CONSTANTINA DEL CARMEN RAMIREZ LIMO, JEAN PIERRE MARTINEZ RAMIREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Doe v. O'Connor et al
as 2:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Kimberly O'Connor, Kimberly Cox, Oscar Martinez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Varner v. Wasmer et al
as 2:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Varner
Defendant:
Todd Wasmer, Oscar Martinez, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
