Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DAVIS-HARRIS et al. v. OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
KHALIF DAVIS-HARRIS and AARON TUTT
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Weaver v. Osmose Utilities Service, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Gregory Weaver
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Corvin v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Timothy Corvin
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv07551
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Weaver v. Osmose Utilities Service, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03108
Plaintiff:
Gregory Weaver
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DAVIS-HARRIS et al. v. OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2022cv07551
Plaintiff:
KHALIF DAVIS-HARRIS and AARON TUTT
Defendant:
OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Corvin v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Corvin
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Timothy Tucker v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06577
Plaintiff:
Timothy Tucker
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. and Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Stallard v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02257
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stallard
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Hodges v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
Desmond Hodges
Defendant:
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
