Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Winningham v. Fentress County et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Trisha Winningham
Defendant:
Fentress County, Michael Reagon, Fast Access Healthcare, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCleary v. QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC et al
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Omarii McCleary
Defendant:
QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC, QCHC of Tennessee, Inc., QCHC Management Services Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Blackwelder et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott, Carman Brown and Frankie Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Murry Blackwelder, Owen Blackwelder, Tammy McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Wicks et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark A Patton
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wicks, Bowden Ladd, Samantha Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomsen v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomsen
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, City of Bristol, Tennessee, James Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Acree et al (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Freda Ramey, State of Tennessee, Brandon Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Owens v. Chambliss et al
as 2:2020cv02680
Defendant:
Prince C. Chambliss and City of Memphis, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Danny M. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00763
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
