Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Integrand Assurance Company v. Everest Reinsurance Company, et al
as 20-1534
Defendant / Appellee: EVEREST REINSURANCE COMPANY, MS AMLIN P/C, ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED TRADING, Trading as Aspen Re London, England and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: INTEGRAND ASSURANCE COMPANY
Susan Pierson, et al v. Hudson Insurance Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35185
Defendant / Appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, HUDSON INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN PIERSON, a single person
Plaintiff: JOHN DOES, 1-5000 or more unidentified persons whose law suits have been dismissed based upon the assertion of Indian sovereign immunity in violations of 25 USC 5321 (c) (3) (A)
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. David Dostalik, et al
as 19-55575
Defendant: CLAIMS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, CAL-REGENT INSURANCE SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID DOSTALIK
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Claims Technology Services, et al
as 19-55576
Defendant: DAVID DOSTALIK, CAL-REGENT INSURANCE SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation
Defendant / Appellant: CLAIMS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Richard Nagby, et al
as 19-55423
Petitioner: KNIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Proposed Intervenor
Defendant: DAVID DOSTALIK, CLAIMS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, CAL-REGENT INSURANCE SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation and others
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD KEITH NAGBY
Plaintiff / Appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Knight Insurance Company, Ltd, et al
as 19-55347
Petitioner / Appellant: KNIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation
Defendant: DAVID DOSTALIK, CLAIMS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, CAL-REGENT INSURANCE SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation and others
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Knight Insurance Company, Ltd., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-55346
Defendant / Appellee: CLAIMS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation, DAVID DOSTALIK and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: ODYSSEY REINSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation
Petitioner / Appellant: KNIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Proposed Intervenor
Odyssey Reinsurance Company v. Integrand Assurance Company
as 3:2019cv01106
Plaintiff: Integrand Assurance Company and Odyssey Reinsurance Company
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Underwriting Members of Lloyd v. Al Rajhi Bank
as 18-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant: Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 2, Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 53, Underwriting of Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 55 and others
Defendant - Appellee: Al Rajhi Bank, National Commercial Bank and Saudi Binladin Group
Defendant: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2 et al v. AL RAJHI BANK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv07853
Plaintiff: UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 2 , UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 53 , UNDERWRITING MEMBERS OF LLOYD'S SYNDICATE 55 and others
Defendant: Al Rajhi Bank , National Commercial Bank and Saudi Binladin Group
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?