Cases 1 - 10 of 24
James v. U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights et al
as 1:2022cv05738
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allan James
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, Ebone Woods Esq. and Gary Kiang Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keita v. American Public University et al
as 1:2022cv00763
Defendant:
American Public University, American Military University, Professor Jonathan Small and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kastner et al v. Tri State Eye et al
as 7:2019cv10668
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kastner and John and Jane Doe 1-20
Defendant:
CIGNA, The EEOC, Town of Middletown NY Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2019cv05433
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc.
Defendant:
Office for Civil Rights, Roger Severino, Alex M. Azar II and others
Amicus Curiae:
the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv05435
Plaintiff:
National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association and Public Health Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Roger Severino and others
Amicus Curiae:
the American Muslim Health Professionals, Institute for Policy Integrity, The American Medical Association and others
Interested Party:
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc. and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv04676
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Public Health Solutions, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, Inc., Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Institute for Policy Integrity, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Osteopathic Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Dr. Regina Renee Frost and Christian Medical and Dental Associations
Consolidated Defendant:
Roger Severino, Office for Civil Rights and Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Adelante Alabama Worker Center et al v. Department Of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv09557
Plaintiff:
Adelante Alabama Worker Center , Detention Watch Network , Greater Birmingham Ministries and others
Defendant:
Department Of Homeland Security and Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Murray J.M. et al v. Valente et al
as 7:2016cv06795
Plaintiff:
Ethlean Murray and J.M.
Defendant:
Jonathan Valente, Karen Gagliardi, George Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Beal v. SUNY Cortland et al
as 5:2016cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rosevelt Beal
Defendant:
SUNY Cortland, SUNY Binghamton, SUNY Chancellor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Day Laborer Organizing Network et al v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
National Day Laborer Organizing Network , Immigration Justice Clinic of The Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law and Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement , United States Department of Justice , United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
