Cases 1 - 8 of 8
State of Texas v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Merrick Garland, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
Ten Members of Congress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The State of Texas v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas and Mayo Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
McCalley v. UT Southwestern Medical Center et al
as 3:2020cv03196
Defendant:
Nicole Bunn, Dr Clifton Lyndell Cox, II, The Texas Medical Board and others
Plaintiff:
Damaris Plaisant McCalley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCalley v. Cousins et al
as 3:2020cv03039
Defendant:
Nicole Bunn, The Attorney General of Texas, The Texas Medical Board and others
Plaintiff:
Damaris Plaisant McCalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCalley v. Cousins et al
as 4:2020cv01134
Defendant:
Nicole Bunn, The Attorney General of Texas, The Texas Medical Board and others
Plaintiff:
Damaris Plaisant McCalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howery v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 4:2008cv00196
Plaintiff:
Errol P Howery
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Kip Hawley and TSA Office of Civil Right & Civil Liberties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Howery v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2008mc00012
Plaintiff:
Errol P Howery
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Kip Hawley and TSA Office of Civil Right & Civil Liberties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
