Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 22-597
Petitioner:
John T. Pickering-George
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration, ALJ, SSA, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review Hearing Office, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division and others
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration et al
as 1:2021cv09251
Plaintiff:
John Pickering-George
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuirty Administration, ALJ, SSA, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review Hearing Office, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fonseca v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 1:2016cv01614
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Fonseca
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Morales v. Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 2:2014cv05420
Plaintiff:
Adam Morales
Defendant:
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Winston v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2014cv04724
Plaintiff:
Tannia Monique Winston
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wahrmann v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 6:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
John K. Wahrmann
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, John Kalil, Mental Health Connections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yusim v. SSA Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 1:2012cv02090
Defendant:
SSA Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Plaintiff:
Mikhail Yusim
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Kast v. Social Security Administration
as 12-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lisl I. Kast
Defendant - Appellee:
Social Security Administration, by its Appeals Counsil of the Office of Disability, Adjudication, and Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
