Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 41 - 50 of 109
Boykin v. Dixon Correctional Center et al
as 3:2017cv50049
Plaintiff: Marshaun Boykin
Defendant: John Varga, Officer(John Doe) and Crisis Watch Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv09966
Plaintiff: Daniel Virgil and Sade Dupree
Defendant: City Of Chicago , Ronald Schmuck and Chicago Police Officers John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Magarvie et al
as 1:2016cv01336
Plaintiff: Terence Taylor
Defendant: Major Magarvie , Malkowski , Tralon Durrett and others
Movant: Nixon Peabody LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv07071
Plaintiff: William Paschal
Defendant: Officer Anderson, Officer John Doe, Sergeant Doody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashaad Ross v. Det. Rosen et al
as 1:2016cv05167
Plaintiff: Rashaad Ross
Movant: Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant: Det. Rosen, Officers John Doe 1-2 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv04560
Plaintiff: Michael Lewis
Defendant: Tom Dart, Riverdale Police Department, Markham County State Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robin v. City of Zion et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv11377
Plaintiff: Richard Robin
Defendant: City of Zion, Richard Ianson, Victor Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bussie v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv10276
Plaintiff: Charda Bussie
Defendant: City of Chicago, Michael Vasquez, Phillip Kwasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv07825
Plaintiff: James Heard
Defendant: City Of Chicago and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calixte v. Village of Glenview et al
as 1:2015cv06285
Plaintiff: Hubert Calixte
Defendant: Village of Glenview and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?