Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Schilling v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04242
Plaintiff:
Donovan Schilling
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Kensley Gachette and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04246
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Green
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Cadeem Pritchard and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanley v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04240
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hanley
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Luke Malskis and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04245
Plaintiff:
John Peterson
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Norman Faulkcon, Officer Cadell Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watchulonis v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04189
Plaintiff:
Siena Watchulonis
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Jasmyn Hawkins and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04190
Plaintiff:
Danielle Moore
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Dwayne DeJonge and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04186
Plaintiff:
Lisa Baker
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Amanda Wortham and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rana v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04188
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Rana
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Jean Noziere and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2021cv00335
Defendant:
SERGEANT EDWARD FLOYD, CHIEF COUNSELOR MITCHELL, DEPUTY WARDEN IVEY and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kesete v. 2 DeKalb County Police Officers
as 1:2021cv03394
Plaintiff:
Noheme Kesete
Defendant:
2 Dekalb County Police Officers, Officer John Doe 1 and Officer John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
