Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Garza v. Harris County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2019cv01263
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, Harris County Sheriff's Department, Harris County Constable Department Pct. 6, Pct. 7, Pct. 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fields v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv03312
Plaintiff:
Terry Feilds and Terry Fields
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, I, Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier and Officer John Doe, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2018cv02918
Defendant:
Detention Officer John Doe 1 and Harris Conty Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
G'Cobra Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tubbs et al v. Baytown Police Department et al
as 4:2018cv02518
Defendant:
Police Chief Keith Dougherty, Ed Gonzales, Baytown Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mae Tubbs and Anthony Tubbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE
as 4:2018cv02441
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Harris et al v. Doe et al
as 4:2017cv03414
Plaintiff:
Regena Harris and Keishanti Price
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Ron Hickman, Harris County Sheriff's Office and others
Respondent:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spurling v. The City of Houston, et al
as 4:2014cv03299
Plaintiff:
Dennis Spurling
Defendant:
The Houston Police Department, The City Of Houston , Charles A. McClelland, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
