Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Fredricks v. Smith
as 24-226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIGEL FREDRICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
Correction Officer SMITH, 10686
Fredricks v. Smith
as 24-25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIGEL FREDRICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
Correction Officer SMITH, 10686
Roscoe Brown v. Smith, et al
as 21-3127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEEINGER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER D'HAPPART and others
David Barrow v. Gary Williams
as 21-7593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES BARROW
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WILLIAMS, GARY T. SETTLE, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Adrian GuilleIn re: Adrian Guille
as 21-2842
Petitioner:
In re: ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, RAYMOND ROYCE, SEARS and others
Respondent:
DAVID RICHARDS, AMY EMRICH, S. PATTERSON and others
Michael Burnett v. Matthew Macauley, et al
as 21-2946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden, WENDY C. LANE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER CUELLAR and others
Terron Dizzley v. Sergeant Pate
as 21-7270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT PATE, female, JAQUILA L. GREEN, CBU Director, OFFICER JOHN K. BROWN, yard officer and others
Michael Burnett v. Wendy Lane, et al
as 21-2752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BURNETT and MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
WENDY C. LANE, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, INSPECTOR MOYER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER CUELLAR and others
Michael Gorbey v. Lt. Brown
as 21-6848
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER SMITH, Unit Manager Poplar Unit, LIEUTENANT MANNING, FCI Beckley, VEST, FCI Beckley and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
