Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Montgomery v. Spencer et al
as 1:2013cv09167
Plaintiff:
Diana Montgomery
Defendant:
Officer Spencer, Officer Smith and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. State of Illinois et al.
as 1:2013cv08575
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harris
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Department Of Corrections, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Luellen v. Cook County et al
as 1:2013cv06831
Plaintiff:
Larry Luellen
Defendant:
Cook County, Tom Dart, John Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luellen v. Dart et al
as 1:2013cv05814
Plaintiff:
Larry Luellen
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer Carrillo, Nurse Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Spivey v. Correctional Officer Smith, et al
as 13-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM O. SPIVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SMITH and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINDENBERG
Winkfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv02104
Plaintiff:
Larry Winkfield
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Officer Smith and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perris Cannaday v. Richard Sandoval, et al
as 11-2829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERRIS D. CANNADAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD SANDOVAL, OFFICER SMITH, OFFICER SCHAD and others
Wilson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv01702
Plaintiff:
Andre Wilson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, James Smith, Darlene Wujcik and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv00413
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones, Jr., Larry Jones, Jr., Veronica Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, James Smith, Darlene Wujcik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Jones et al
as 1:2007cv05255
Plaintiff:
Louethel Jones, Louethel Jones and Louethel Jones
Defendant:
Officer Jones, Officer Smith, Sergeant Queen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
