Cases 1 - 10 of 17
STAGWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. OH
as 1:2022cv03495
Not Classified By Court:
STAGWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and OH RICHARD
Defendant:
RICHARD OH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
Robert Johnson v. Progressive Max Insurance Com, et al
as 20-7015
Defendant / Appellee:
Peter B. Lewis Estate, Pacific Motor Club, Jacobs Field, (Cleveland, OH) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 19-5014
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, Rice Pichon, BJ Fadem and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao, Esquire, Attorney and Yi Tai Shao
HACKMAN v. ONE BRANDS LLC
as 1:2018cv02101
Defendant:
ONE BRANDS LLC and ONE BRANDS LLC doing business as OH YEAH!
Plaintiff:
GLORIA HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEO et al v. OH et al
as 1:2018cv00785
Plaintiff:
KANG KYU SEO , DANITA EVETTE CHASE , MICHELLE JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES MOON SUK OH and WADE ROAD, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Bernard Kayiji v. Muriel Bowser, et al
as 17-7116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bernard Makau Kayiji
Defendant - Appellee:
Muriel Bowser, Stephanie Miller, Joseph Oh, J.D., Senior Detective (D-1) Retired and others
KAYIJI v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2017cv00959
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MAKAU KAYIJI
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, STEPHANIE MILLER, JOSEPH OH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
